The International Bar Association (IBA) recently provided a write-up of the rules governing evidence in international arbitration (“IBA Rules”). The IBA Rules are used primarily by international arbitration practitioners to assist them in their efforts to resolve domestic and cross-border commercial disputes. But that’s not to say that students should not take an interest in the IBA Rules and their impact. In fact, a basic understanding of the IBA Rules is helpful for aspiring international arbitration students and practitioners. So let’s take a moment to explore what international arbitration actually is and its interesting history.
What Is International Arbitration?
International Arbitration is basically a contract between two or more parties to settle a dispute outside of a courtroom. The parties each name an arbitrator, both arbitrators select a third arbitrator, and those three arbitrators together hear evidence, hear arguments, make a decision as a panel, and then issue a final decision. That decision is in essence a final judgment that is enforceable in numerous jurisdictions worldwide, and further, parties who lose may not appeal that decision in the traditional sense.
Why Should Students Care About The IBA Rules On The Taking Of Evidence?
The IBA Rules allow the parties to agree whether they will give shorter or longer time periods to produce documents, whether they can require non-parties to produce documents, whether they will allow witnesses to provide expert reports without hearing testimony, and whether certain questions may be posed to witnesses.
In short, the IBA Rules allow the parties to customize their discovery process and even eliminate the entire process by stipulation. For instance, they permit parties to assign responsibility to pay the cost of producing documents. Further, they permit parties to stipulate that they will not take depositions of non-party witnesses during the evidence-taking process.
The point of the IBA Rules is to speed up the evidence-taking process, bring down the costs of taking evidence, and create relative equality of power during the evidence-taking process (e.g., if Party A has better access to certain documents than Party B). It is preferable to achieve these goals through agreement because the underlying goal of international arbitration is to provide a final and binding resolution. Once the parties stifle evidence-taking opportunities, they can’t go back for more.
These IBA Rules are important because if a dispute goes to international arbitration and the parties have not considered terms for their evidence-taking process, there is a good chance that gaps or issues will arise during the evidence-taking process.
Indeed, the IBA Rules are powerful and provide a template for international arbitration evidence-taking, but it is always advisable that students read them and understand them so that when they draft a new international arbitration agreement, they know how important taking evidence will be to resolving disputes.
Is The IBA Rules On Taking Evidence Fair To The World?
Yes. International arbitration provides a forum for parties to settle disputes worldwide. Domestic courts and many governmental bodies are not bound by the jurisdiction of any international organization, but private companies may apply the IBA Rules to their disputes directly.
The catch is, however, that the party seeking security for its arbitration-related claims must be able to find another nation that is willing to enforce and recognize such an arbitration agreement. In many cases, such another nation may very well be able to do that, but in other alleged cases, the nation may not.
For instance, the United States Supreme Court recently examined a case dealing with disagreements over whether arbitration agreements are valid and enforceable. In Amgen v. Harris, the Court ruled in favor of Amgen, a California-based company, against Harris, an employee who alleged trade secret violations and a breach of contract.
Now, Amgen and Harris may have agreed to use the IBA Rules to settle their dispute and each of their agreements may have been governed by a different country’s international arbitration rules and laws.
While the US Supreme Court decided that Amgen’s arbitration claim was valid, other courts will likely wrestle with the broader issue of whether certain contracts are valid generally.
Hence, the larger question remains: Should the IBA Rules provide a process that may be applied once disputes for enforcement of international business agreements arise, or should the IBA Rules regulate the dispute-resolution process overall?
While Amgen v. Harris addressed California state law, the larger question has not yet been answered.
What Does The IBA Do?
The IBA was founded in 1940 to promote world peace and development for the legal profession through greater awareness and cooperation amongst its members. The IBA is currently composed of lawyers from twenty-eight countries who practice law early on in their careers and subsequently meet at international law events hosted by the IBA around the world.
What’s Going On In The World That The IBA Can Help With?
Recently, the International Bar Association spoke out against a controversial bill proposed in Hong Kong that would target certain social media outlets which provide information on fundamental rights. The IBA’s statement also called upon China to keep its word in keeping the law.
What Are Some Good Examples Of Possible Careers In International Law And Arbitration?
It is entirely possible to work in international law and arbitration at a basic or mid-level, right out of law school. Often, the best first position is in an advocacy role (where you are tasked with arguing on behalf of your client), with the possibility of later advancing in senior levels to an attorney who advocates on behalf of the organization that employs you.
The IBA certainly provides education and other resources to support aspiring international law and arbitration students. It does not, however, assist students directly through educational sponsorships or grants.
Even so, students may apply the IBA’s principles of impartiality, professionalism, collegiality, and respect for independence to enhance their own education. Some good examples of possible careers include, but are not limited to: An oral advocate; a technological or pen-and-paper evidence-taker; a document reviewer; an executive-level expert; an investigative reporter; an oral expert; or the organizer of evidence-processing.
What Are Your Thoughts?
International arbitration seems like a lot, but it can be simplified for discussion. Are the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence more technical than helpful? Why do you think that is and what would you do differently?